Chapter 1: The Dilemma of Vaccination Incentives

Navigating the complex topic of vaccination incentives can be challenging, and I find myself torn between various perspectives and questions.

First and foremost, I want to clarify that I have received both doses of the vaccine as soon as I was eligible. My son-in-law works as a pharmacist in a hospital, and I trust his guidance for reliable information. I am fortunate enough to have family members in the medical field, a privilege not everyone has.

During a significant health crisis that has affected us all, many individuals cannot reach out to healthcare professionals for advice at their convenience. Personally, I am a firm believer in science and was eager to receive the vaccine without any cost.

Isn't it enough that the vaccines are offered at no charge? Unless transportation presents an issue—something that affects many—what's preventing individuals from getting vaccinated? I've encountered a myriad of reasons: religious beliefs, fears of microchipping, concerns over approval status, and even conspiracy theories. Some simply cite their youth, health, and strength as reasons to abstain from vaccination.

Despite former President Trump's vaccination status, he has not strongly encouraged his supporters to follow suit, leaving many unaware that he has received the vaccine, potentially perpetuating harmful myths.

It's important to recognize that a small portion of the population cannot receive vaccinations for health reasons, and some do experience adverse reactions. However, the likelihood of serious long-term side effects for most people remains quite low.

So why do so many refuse vaccination? While we cannot forcibly vaccinate anyone—such an act would be illegal—can we offer incentives beyond merely saving lives? It turns out that financial incentives are a potential solution.

In my state, there are lotteries where winners receive a million-dollar prize. It's remarkable: a life-saving vaccine combined with a chance at a substantial cash reward. Additionally, there are now offers of $100 for each person who gets vaccinated.

However, I have reservations about this strategy. Who funds these cash prizes? Presumably, the state taxpayers do. One of my primary concerns is this: if we entice individuals with monetary rewards, why would they opt for the vaccine without such incentives? As frustration with vaccine hesitancy grows, government officials seem increasingly inclined to resort to these strategies.

While I believe some individuals may be swayed to get vaccinated through these incentives, could this approach have adverse effects? As the state escalates its offerings, some individuals might hold out longer, hoping for an even greater reward.

Moreover, what of those who adhered to the guidelines and received their vaccinations promptly, without any expectation of a reward? While I view the vaccine as a significant benefit, I can't help but feel a hint of resentment toward the incentivization for those who waited.

I struggle to understand the mindset of individuals who refuse vaccination, but this is a free society, and they have the right to make their own choices. I'm certain they find my perspective puzzling as well. Sometimes, we must accept differing viewpoints, even though in this case, it could lead to tragic outcomes.

Section 1.1: Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy

In order to address the issue of vaccine hesitancy, we must look at the various factors that contribute to this phenomenon.

Subsection 1.1.1: The Role of Misinformation

Chapter 2: The Ethics of Bribery in Public Health

In the video titled "New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio promotes a new incentive to get vaccinated: Shake Shack," the mayor discusses a unique approach to encourage vaccination through enticing rewards.

The second video, "Do You Regret Getting the Jab? | Man on the Street," explores public opinions and personal stories surrounding vaccination, providing insight into the diverse perspectives on this critical issue.