Cosmology: The Limitations of Language

Language often confines our understanding. Many terms require context to clarify whether they refer to something literal or abstract. For instance, the term "Universe" traditionally encompassed everything that exists. If a framework with multiple universes exists, it would still be considered part of the Universe. Discussing the multiverse introduces a new framework that is potentially infinite and exceeds any human or existential measure, reaching into areas such as transpersonal psychology. Science struggles to explore these concepts without touching on metaphysical and spiritual implications.

In Anton Petrov's recent video, he investigates the idea of a multiverse composed of countless universes arising from a quantum foam-like structure. The number of these "bubbles" that develop into full-fledged universes is a matter of speculation. It’s conceivable that these universes could be larger internally, particularly if their expansion leads to diverging dimensions that remain unmeasured.

The scientific theory Petrov examines could potentially clarify many phenomena observed in cosmology. Most notably, it could elucidate the universe's expansion, with merging bubbles possibly accounting for dark energy.

I find myself pondering questions best suited for a physicist. Lacking immediate access to one, I resort to writing my reflections. If anyone takes the time to read and comment on my musings, it would be greatly appreciated. Have you ever contemplated the universe and everything it encompasses?

Recent findings from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) suggest that the universe might be older than we previously thought. An age twice that of our current estimates could clarify anomalies like Methuselah's star, which appears to predate the universe itself. Hypothetically, if this multiverse notion holds true and bubble universes can merge, is it possible that a universe with a solitary star has combined with ours? Could universal membranes collide and share elements similarly to living cells? Is it conceivable that a mere collision between universes could introduce a single star or galaxy into our universe? Might the antimatter dilemma stem from an unseen structure that separates matter and antimatter universes before they even form bubbles?

Questions arise: Is the quantum foam an infinite yet consistent entity, or does it emerge from something beyond? Do these bubbles originate from the equivalent of volcanic vents in an expansive cosmological ocean? If so, does this imply that universes closer to their origin are more susceptible to bombardment from other universes? A stable or flat growth would suggest distance from the origin, while a contracting universe would indicate extreme remoteness. Conversely, an expanding universe implies proximity to the origin of all universes.

Could we be oscillating within this cosmic soup, akin to a colossal lava lamp, leading us to question whether the universe's age is an absolute measure? Or, intriguingly, could we propose that each universe behaves like a living cell within a grander organism? If the Universe is indeed a living cell rather than a mere bubble, could it absorb smaller universes and eventually reach a threshold where it divides, creating two distinct universes? Hello, wonderful beings—now in stereo!

Aliens might seem like a more plausible conclusion…

Indeed, attempting to conceptualize the overarching structure that encompasses everything is an immense challenge, both literally and abstractly. Yet, I find myself striving to grasp something so vast that it often feels necessary to invoke the divine.

Given the vastness and complexity of the cosmos, how can we not already acknowledge the existence of extraterrestrial life? If universes can collide, might we traverse into alternate realities? If this Universe is in decline, could we transition to a younger universe, akin to fleas hopping to a new host? Are universes interconnected through a cosmological substrate, resembling tiny umbilical cords, or the tunnels described by those who have experienced near-death situations? Do black holes drain back into this cosmic substrate, or do they lead to the birth of new universes?

I realize I am intermingling various domains. Those with a staunchly atheistic perspective may oppose blending these concepts. However, the universe will continue to collide, and if our Universe emerges from a foundational reality that includes a multiverse, then that fundamental reality is indeed significant.

This foundational essence would hold more relevance for life on Earth than the sun, the stability of our solar system's orbits, or any cosmological constants one might imagine. Thus, the universe emerges from this fundamental "Something." Consciousness, according to neuroscientists, arises from matter, shaped by eons of evolutionary refinement. While the bubble universe theory may shed light on our observations, it doesn’t necessarily dictate uniform evolutionary outcomes across all universes. This notion is further illuminated by the speculative discussions among scientists regarding changing constants and their potential effects.

What implications does this have for our understanding? Are some universes inherently flawed? Could there be versions of universes akin to the "Pakleds" from Star Trek? Oh, let’s hope not!

If the cosmos is fundamentally rooted in consciousness, then every thought generates new thoughts. Each universe can be viewed as a word, a piece of poetry, or a mathematical expression—a film reel tossed into the cosmic expanse, akin to fireworks. The universe elegantly translates into a singular song: the Uni-Verse.

However, if this theory holds, we are not dealing with just a single melody but rather a multitude of notes. If consciousness is the base reality, then each universe is a distinct song, a verse, or a chapter within a greater whole, and the Pakleds exist just as surely as everything imaginable must exist, for non-existence cannot be.

Despite our attempts, the universe has yet to be detected as resonating in any particular key or mode. It appears to be consistently singing a note of B-flat, over and over.

Might each universe possess its unique flavor or tone? Are there seven distinct colors or tones? Do monks chant mantras aligned with the universe's Om? Is the B-flat of Gregorian chant merely coincidental?

On January 30, 2004, John Rockwell discussed the cosmological B-flat tone in a New York Times article, linked below.

Returning to the broader picture, what does the black hole's B-flat signify? If this frequency serves as the universe's acoustical foundation, might our entire tuning system, centered on middle C, require a reevaluation? The Western harmonic system builds upon keys with increasing sharps and flats radiating from middle C, but perhaps we should consider starting from B-flat instead. This could represent a paradigm shift as significant as the transition from a flat Earth to a heliocentric model. Or perhaps not.

Is it possible that Rockwell and I are arriving at the same conclusion? His article sought to connect the B-flat to the Taos Hum, a low-frequency oscillation perceived by some individuals that defies scientific explanation. It comforts me to think that my tinnitus might be the universe serenading me. There are absolute and relative pitches. When tuning an orchestra, most people adhere to the standard Stuttgart pitch of 440 Hz, which corresponds to the note A. Some argue that tuning to 432 Hz is more beneficial. The significance of harmonics is undeniable, as sound waves possess the power to destroy an airplane, a bridge, or a city wall, as well as to heal, shift moods, or even disrupt cells in the body. So, does harmonizing with the universe connect us to the underlying reality or merely this one?

If we alter the universe's pitch, does that shift everything else?

Nikola Tesla asserted that everything in existence vibrates at its own fundamental resonance frequency, which can be manipulated to create or destroy. How does sound shape physical form?

He uncovered these truths long before the existence of black holes and the universal resonant pitch of B-flat became apparent. I can’t help but wonder why we don't seriously contemplate the philosophy he championed:

"If you want to understand the world, consider it in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration. The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence."

While sound is a tangible property, the universe vibrating at B-flat is not a sound in the conventional sense; it cannot be heard directly. Instead, it can be detected through the resonance of universal structures. We also know that gravitational waves ripple through the cosmos. Now, let’s expand our perspective further, into the multiverse realm, envisioning a series of musical spheres—universes strung along a cosmic score. I realize this may seem abstract, but if a multiverse exists, it is technically physical, yet from our viewpoint, it remains unknowable, accessible only to those with the capacity for perception.

Can we see it? Can we hear it? Is it a feeling, an intuition, or an inference?

Certain states of consciousness appear more adept at accessing subtle perceptions that typically elude our everyday awareness. Can we conceptualize consciousness as vibrations and frequencies? Do we not instinctively gravitate toward elements that resonate with us? While this isn't always advantageous, it does reveal insights into what we must overcome in our subconscious navigation.

When astronauts left the moon, they intentionally crashed the lunar lander, causing it to resonate like a bell. I can’t help but wonder what pitch that produced. They deduced from that minor collision that the moon is hollow. The Earth's interior has also been mapped using sound waves. Might we be able to chart the universe similarly to how we explored the Earth and the moon?

Does the B-flat of existence within our universe provide insights into surrounding structures? If we are continuously bombarded by other universes, wouldn’t that leave an oscillating frequency?

Could the existence of other universes influence our universe's pitch? Can a universe elevate its status within the cosmic hierarchy by raising its vibrational state? Is B-flat the most fundamental note, or are there higher and lower octaves?

Are our souls naturally inclined to navigate a spectrum of "universities" based on our resonant soul frequencies? Universities, universes—how fascinating! In the mind of the divine, countless entities exist, each requiring a fitting environment. Is this not evident on Earth, where life seems uniquely tailored to thrive in its surroundings?

Suddenly, the insights from Robert Monroe's Gateway series start to make profound sense to me.