Choosing the M2 Pro Mac Mini Over the Mac Studio: A Thoughtful Analysis
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to Apple Silicon
In the realm of desktop Macs, Apple is on the verge of unveiling its latest model. Speculation is high as enthusiasts await the debut of the M2 Pro Mac Mini.
Despite my usual practice of avoiding reader comments on my Medium stories, I recently found myself breaking that habit. A reader raised a legitimate question regarding my intent to wait for the M2 Pro Mac Mini instead of simply opting for the base model Mac Studio. This prompted me to reflect on my decision.
Before delving into my reasoning, let's address the current status of the M2 Pro Mac Mini. My earlier article hinted at a November release, but subsequent reports indicated that Apple would not launch new Macs in 2022. Specifically, Tim Cook noted during a quarterly earnings call that the product line was already “set” for the holiday season. Luca Maestri, Apple’s CFO, reinforced this by predicting a slowdown in revenue growth due to the lack of major MacBook Pro releases.
Fast forward to now, and recent updates suggest that Apple is actively testing a new Mac Pro alongside an M2 Pro Mac Mini to replace the remaining Intel models. The expected updates include both regular M2 and M2 Pro variants, although the timeline remains vague, with “early next year” being the current consensus.
Chapter 2: Evaluating the Mac Studio vs. M2 Pro Mac Mini
A reader pointed out that the Mac Studio already offers superior processing power, more connectivity options, and enhanced thermal management compared to the anticipated M2 Pro Mac Mini. So, why hold off on a purchase that may take months to materialize?
Section 2.1: Processing Power Comparison
According to GeekBench 5, my M1 MacBook Air scores are 1707 (single-core) and 8734 (multi-core). The M1 Max Mac Studio scores slightly higher at 1753 and 12334, respectively. A report on 9to5Mac suggested that an “M2 Pro” might score around 2027 (single-core) and 14888 (multi-core). If these figures hold true, the M2 Pro Mac Mini could deliver an 18% boost in single-core and a remarkable 70% improvement in multi-core performance.
Section 2.2: Connectivity Options
The Mac Studio features three front-facing ports (two USB-C and an SDXC card slot) plus four Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-A ports, an HDMI port, a 10Gb Ethernet port, and a headphone jack. In contrast, the Mac Mini includes two Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-A ports, an HDMI port, a Gigabit Ethernet port, and a headphone jack. Speculation suggests the M2 Pro Mac Mini may include two additional Thunderbolt ports.
While the Mac Studio has the advantage in port selection, the M1 Mac Mini’s configuration is adequate for my requirements.
Section 2.3: Thermal Performance
Apple claims that the M1 Max Mac Studio has a maximum thermal output of 392 BTU/h, compared to the M1 Mac Mini's 133 BTU/h. This seems to favor the Mac Studio; however, it’s noteworthy that the Intel-based 2018 Mac Mini had a higher thermal output of 417 BTU/h. Given that the M2 Pro Mac Mini likely shares the same chassis, it should have sufficient thermal capacity for optimal performance.
Moreover, there have been reports of the Mac Studio emitting an unusual high-pitched noise, while my M1 Mac Mini operates silently.
Conclusion: Making a Thoughtful Choice
Based on the information available, I believe the M2 Pro Mac Mini will strike the best balance of performance, cost, and features for my needs. Although I continue to wait for its arrival, I recognize the possibility that I might be making a miscalculation. My previous experience with the M1 MacBook Air taught me that sometimes it’s better to act sooner rather than later.
In the video "SAVE Your MONEY! Mac Mini M2 Pro Vs Mac Studio M2 Max," the presenter explores the financial implications of choosing between these two models, providing valuable insights for potential buyers.
The second video, "M2 Mac Studio VS M2 Mac mini - DON'T BE FOOLED!" offers a critical look at the differences and similarities between the M2 models, helping consumers make informed decisions.
I hope that readers find this analysis both engaging and insightful. Anyone who wishes to share their thoughts is welcome to do so, but I’ll focus on the positive feedback and continue refining my perspective.